Comparative analysis of smart city scientific research trends in the USA and China

0
Comparative analysis of smart city scientific research trends in the USA and China
  • Nam, T. & Pardo, T. A. Conceptualizing smart city with dimensions of technology, people, and institutions. In Proc. 12th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research 282–291 (Association for Computing Machinery, 2011).

  • Mora, L., Bolici, R. & Deakin, M. The first two decades of smart-city research: a bibliometric analysis. J. Urban Technol. 24, 3–27 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenfield, A. Against the Smart City: A Pamphlet. This Is Part I of “The City is Here to Use” (Do projects, 2013).

  • Kitchin, R. The real-time city? Big data and smart urbanism. GeoJournal 79, 1–14 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  • Castelnovo, W. in Co-production in the Public Sector: Experiences and Challenges (eds Fugini, M. et al.) 97–117 (Springer, 2016).

  • Cowley, R., Joss, S. & Dayot, Y. The smart city and its publics: insights from across six UK cities. Urban Res. Pract. 11, 53–77 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  • Fortunato, S. et al. Science of science. Science 359, eaao0185 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  • Azoulay, P. et al. Toward a more scientific science. Science 361, 1194–1197 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  • Camero, A. & Alba, E. Smart city and information technology: a review. Cities 93, 84–94 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  • Vishnivetskaya, A. & Alexandrova, E. “Smart city” concept. Implementation practice. IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng. 497, 012019 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  • Costales, E. Identifying sources of innovation: building a conceptual framework of the smart city through a social innovation perspective. Cities 120, 103459 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  • Neirotti, P., De Marco, A., Cagliano, A. C., Mangano, G. & Scorrano, F. Current trends in smart city initiatives: some stylised facts. Cities 38, 25–36 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, J. Smart city trends: a focus on 5 countries and 15 companies. Cities 123, 103551 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hu, Q. & Zheng, Y. Smart city initiatives: a comparative study of American and Chinese cities. J. Urban Aff. 43, 504–525 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rejeb, A. et al. Smart city research: a bibliometric and main path analysis. J. Data Inf. Manage. 4, 343–370 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  • Qian, X., Chen, M., Zhao, F. & Ling, H. An assessment framework of global smart cities for sustainable development in a post-pandemic era. Cities 150, 104990 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  • Angelidou, M. Smart cities: a conjuncture of four forces. Cities 47, 95–106 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  • Atha, K. et al. China’s Smart Cities Development (SOS International, 2020).

  • Lane, J. Assessing the impact of science funding. Science 324, 1273–1275 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  • Abadi, H. H. N., He, Z. & Pecht, M. Artificial intelligence-related research funding by the US National Science Foundation and the National Natural Science Foundation of China. IEEE Access 8, 183448–183459 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lok, C. Science funding: science for the masses. Nature 465, 416–418 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  • Zare, R. N. & Winnacker, E.-L. China’s science funding. Science 334, 433 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  • Stokes, D. E. Pasteur’s Quadrant: Basic Science and Technological Innovation (Brookings Institution Press, 2011).

  • Higashide, N., Zhang, Y., Asatani, K., Miura, T. & Sakata, I. Quantifying advances from basic research to applied research in material science. Technovation 135, 103050 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalluri, B., Chronopoulos, C. & Kozine, I. The concept of smartness in cyber–physical systems and connection to urban environment. Ann. Rev. Control 51, 1–22 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  • Luusua, A., Ylipulli, J., Foth, M. & Aurigi, A. Urban AI: understanding the emerging role of artificial intelligence in smart cities. AI Soc. 38, 1039–1044 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  • Batty, M. et al. Smart cities of the future. Eur. Phys. J. Spec. Top. 214, 481–518 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kummitha, R. K. R. & Crutzen, N. How do we understand smart cities? An evolutionary perspective. Cities 67, 43–52 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  • Andreani, S., Kalchschmidt, M., Pinto, R. & Sayegh, A. Reframing technologically enhanced urban scenarios: a design research model towards human centered smart cities. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 142, 15–25 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sha, K., Taeihagh, A. & De Jong, M. Governing disruptive technologies for inclusive development in cities: a systematic literature review. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 203, 123382 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhao, F., Fashola, O. I., Olarewaju, T. I. & Onwumere, I. Smart city research: a holistic and state-of-the-art literature review. Cities 119, 103406 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  • Al-Saidi, M. & Zaidan, E. Understanding and enabling “communities” within smart cities: a literature review. J. Plan. Lit. 39, 186–202 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  • Cornish, F. et al. Participatory action research. Nat. Rev. Methods Primers (2023).

  • Williams, S., White, A., Waiganjo, P., Orwa, D. & Klopp, J. The digital matatu project: using cell phones to create an open source data for Nairobi’s semi-formal bus system. J. Transp. Geogr. 49, 39–51 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, S. Data Action: Using Data for Public Good (MIT Press, 2020).

  • Katapally, T. R. The SMART framework: integration of citizen science, community-based participatory research, and systems science for population health science in the digital age. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 7, e14056 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  • D’Ignazio, C. & Bhargava, R. DataBasic: design principles, tools and activities for data literacy learners. J. Community Inform. 12, 83–107 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  • Han, M. J. N. & Kim, M. J. A systematic review of smart city research from an urban context perspective. Cities 150, 105027 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  • Dameri, R. P. & Benevolo, C. Governing smart cities: an empirical analysis. Soc. Sci. Comput. Rev. 34, 693–707 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  • Del-Real, C., Ward, C. & Sartipi, M. What do people want in a smart city? Exploring the stakeholders’ opinions, priorities and perceived barriers in a medium-sized city in the United States. Int. J. Urban Sci. 27, 50–74 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  • Acuto, M., Parnell, S. & Seto, K. C. Building a global urban science. Nat. Sustain. 1, 2–4 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  • Stoye, E. How research funders are tackling coronavirus disruption. Nature (2020).

  • Garisto, D. Exclusive: Trump team freezes new NSF awards—and could soon axe hundreds of grants. Nature (2025).

  • García-Holgado, A., Marcos-Pablos, S. & García-Peñalvo, F. J. Guidelines for performing Systematic Research Projects Reviews. Int. J. Interact. Multimed. Artif. Intell. 6, 136–144 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  • Moher, D. et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement. Syst. Rev. 4, 1 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  • Patel, D. et al. Evaluating prompt engineering on GPT-3.5’s performance in USMLE-style medical calculations and clinical scenarios generated by GPT-4. Sci. Rep. 14, 17341 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  • Pickvance, C. G. Four varieties of comparative analysis. J. Hous. Built Environ. 16, 7–28 (2001).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilardi, F., Alizadeh, M. & Kubli, M. ChatGPT outperforms crowd workers for text-annotation tasks. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 120, e2305016120 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  • Khraisha, Q., Put, S., Kappenberg, J., Warraitch, A. & Hadfield, K. Can large language models replace humans in systematic reviews? Evaluating GPT‐4’s efficacy in screening and extracting data from peer‐reviewed and grey literature in multiple languages. Res. Synth. Methods 15, 616–626 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  • Dennstädt, F., Zink, J., Putora, P. M., Hastings, J. & Cihoric, N. Title and abstract screening for literature reviews using large language models: an exploratory study in the biomedical domain. Syst. Rev. 13, 158 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, J. L. The diffusion of innovations among the American states. Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. 63, 880–899 (1969).

    Google Scholar 

  • Leydesdorff, L. & Rafols, I. Local emergence and global diffusion of research technologies: an exploration of patterns of network formation. J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 62, 846–860 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  • link

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *