Truant, E., Borlatto, E., Crocco, E. & Bhatia, M. ESG performance and technological change: Current state-of-the-art, development and future directions. J. Clean. Prod. 429, 139493. (2023).
Google Scholar
Gao, J., Hua, G. & Huo, B. Green finance policies, financing constraints and corporate ESG performance: Insights from supply chain management. Oper. Manag. Res. (2024).
Google Scholar
Ren, X. & Ren, Y. Public environmental concern and corporate ESG performance. Finance Res. Lett. 61, 104991. (2024).
Google Scholar
Li, J. & Wu, D. (Andrew). Do corporate social responsibility engagements lead to real environmental, social, and governance impact? Manag. Sci. 66(6), 2564–2588. (2020).
Yu, E. P., Luu, B. V. & Chen, C. H. Greenwashing in environmental, social and governance disclosures. Res. Int. Bus. Finance 52, 101192. (2020).
Google Scholar
Liao, F., Hu, Y., Chen, M. & Xu, S. Digital transformation and corporate green supply chain efficiency: Evidence from China. Econ. Anal. Policy 81, 195–207. (2024).
Google Scholar
Hu, J. Synergistic effect of pollution reduction and carbon emission mitigation in the digital economy. J. Environ. Manag. 337, 117755. (2023).
Google Scholar
Wessel, L., Baiyere, A., Ologeanu-Taddei, R., Cha, J. & Blegind Jensen, T. Unpacking the difference between digital transformation and IT-Enabled organizational transformation. J. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 22(1), 102–129. (2021).
Google Scholar
Arayssi, M., Jizi, M. & Tabaja, H. H. The impact of board composition on the level of ESG disclosures in GCC countries. Sustain. Acc. Manag. Policy J. 11(1), 137–161. (2020).
Google Scholar
Arvidsson, S. & Dumay, J. Corporate ESG reporting quantity, quality and performance: Where to now for environmental policy and practice? Bus. Strategy Environ. 31(3), 1091–1110. (2021). Portico.
Google Scholar
Bai, F., Shang, M. & Huang, Y. Corporate culture and ESG performance: Empirical evidence from China. J. Clean. Prod. 437, 140732. (2024).
Google Scholar
Yang, J., Zuo, Z., Li, Y. & Guo, H. Manufacturing enterprises move towards sustainable development: ESG performance, market-based environmental regulation, and green technological innovation. J. Environ. Manag. 372, 123244. (2024).
Google Scholar
Xue, Q., Wang, H. & Bai, C. Local green finance policies and corporate ESG performance. Int. Rev. Finance 23(4), 721–749. (2023). Portico.
Google Scholar
Lu, S. & Cheng, B. Does environmental regulation affect firms’ ESG performance? Evidence from China. Manag. Decis. Econ. 44(4), 2004–2009. (2022). Portico.
Google Scholar
Wang, S. & Esperança, J. P. Can digital transformation improve market and ESG performance? Evidence from Chinese SMEs. J. Clean. Prod. 419, 137980. (2023).
Google Scholar
Zhang, L., Ye, Y., Meng, Z., Ma, N. & Wu, C.-H. Enterprise digital transformation, dynamic capabilities, and ESG performance. J. Glob. Inf. Manag. 32(1), 1–20. (2024).
Google Scholar
Wang, H., Jiao, S., Bu, K., Wang, Y. & Wang, Y. Digital transformation and manufacturing companies’ ESG responsibility performance. Finance Res. Lett. 58, 104370. (2023).
Google Scholar
Fang, M., Nie, H. & Shen, X. Can enterprise digitization improve ESG performance? Econ. Model. 118, 106101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2022.106101 (2023).
Google Scholar
Bloom, N., Garicano, L., Sadun, R. & Van Reenen, J. The distinct effects of information technology and communication technology on firm organization. Manag. Sci. 60(12), 2859–2885. (2014).
Google Scholar
Wamba, S. F., Dubey, R., Gunasekaran, A. & Akter, S. The performance effects of big data analytics and supply chain ambidexterity: The moderating effect of environmental dynamism. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 222, 107498. (2020).
Google Scholar
Liu, X. et al. Data-driven ESG assessment for blockchain services: A comparative study in textiles and apparel industry. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 190, 106837. (2023).
Google Scholar
Wang, L. & Hou, S. The impact of digital transformation and earnings management on ESG performance: Evidence from Chinese listed enterprises. Sci. Rep. 14(1). (2024).
Zhang, S. The impact of digital transformation on ESG performance and the moderation of mixed-ownership reform: The evidence from Chinese state‐owned enterprises. Corp. Soc. Responsib. Environ. Manag. 31(3), 2195–2210. (2023).
Google Scholar
Ahmadova, G., Delgado-Márquez, B. L., Pedauga, L. E., Hiz, L. & D. I Too good to be true: The inverted U-shaped relationship between home-country digitalization and environmental performance. Ecol. Econ. 196, 107393. (2022).
Google Scholar
Ghosh, S., Hughes, M., Hodgkinson, I. & Hughes, P. Digital transformation of industrial businesses: A dynamic capability approach. Technovation 113, 102414. (2022).
Google Scholar
Aben, T. A. E., van der Valk, W., Roehrich, J. K. & Selviaridis, K. Managing information asymmetry in public–private relationships undergoing a digital transformation: The role of contractual and relational governance. Int. J. Oper. Prod. Manag. 41(7), 1145–1191. (2021).
Google Scholar
Xu, J., Yu, Y., Zhang, M. & Zhang, J. Z. Impacts of digital transformation on eco-innovation and sustainable performance: Evidence from Chinese manufacturing companies. J. Clean. Prod. 393, 136278. (2023).
Google Scholar
Maiurova, A. et al. Promoting digital transformation in waste collection service and waste recycling in Moscow (Russia): Applying a circular economy paradigm to mitigate climate change impacts on the environment. J. Clean. Prod. 354, 131604. (2022).
Google Scholar
Fernandes, C. I., Veiga, P. M., Ferreira, J. J. M. & Hughes, M. Green growth versus economic growth: Do sustainable technology transfer and innovations lead to an imperfect choice? Bus. Strategy Environ. 30(4), 2021–2037. (2021). Portico.
Google Scholar
Veile, J. W., Schmidt, M. -C. & Voigt, K. I. Toward a new era of cooperation: How industrial digital platforms transform business models in industry 4.0. J. Bus. Res. 143, 387–405. (2022).
Google Scholar
Wang, J., Omar, A. H., Alotaibi, F. M., Daradkeh, Y. I. & Althubiti, S. A. Business intelligence ability to enhance organizational performance and performance evaluation capabilities by improving data mining systems for competitive advantage. Inf. Process. Manag., 59(6), 103075. (2022).
Hamann-Lohmer, J., Bendig, M. & Lasch, R. Investigating the impact of digital transformation on relationship and collaboration dynamics in supply chains and manufacturing networks—a multi-case study. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 262, 108932. (2023).
Google Scholar
Dyck, A., Lins, K. V., Roth, L. & Wagner, H. F. Do institutional investors drive corporate social responsibility? International evidence. J. Financ. Econ. 131(3), 693–714. (2019).
Google Scholar
Gillan, S. L., Koch, A. & Starks, L. T. Firms and social responsibility: A review of ESG and CSR research in corporate finance. J. Corp. Finance 66, 101889. (2021).
Google Scholar
El Ghoul, S., Guedhami, O., Kwok, C. C. Y. & Mishra, D. R. Does corporate social responsibility affect the cost of capital? J. Bank. Finance 35(9), 2388–2406. (2011).
Google Scholar
Barko, T., Cremers, M. & Renneboog, L. Shareholder engagement on environmental, social, and governance performance. J. Bus. Ethics 180(2), 777–812. (2021).
Google Scholar
Cheng, B., Ioannou, I. & Serafeim, G. Corporate social responsibility and access to finance. Strateg. Manag. J. 35(1), 1–23. (2013). Portico.
Google Scholar
Grewal, D., Hulland, J., Kopalle, P. K. & Karahanna, E. The future of technology and marketing: A multidisciplinary perspective. J. Acad. Mark. Sci. 48(1), 1–8. (2019).
Google Scholar
Loconto, A. & Busch, L. Standards, techno-economic networks, and playing fields: Performing the global market economy. Rev. Int. Polit. Econ. 17(3), 507–536. (2010).
Google Scholar
Qiu, L. D., Zhou, M. & Wei, X. Regulation, innovation, and firm selection: The Porter hypothesis under monopolistic competition. J. Environ. Econ. Manag. 92, 638–658. (2018).
Google Scholar
Li, D., Huang, M., Ren, S., Chen, X. & Ning, L. Environmental legitimacy, green innovation, and corporate carbon disclosure: Evidence from CDP China 100. J. Bus. Ethics 150(4), 1089–1104. (2016).
Google Scholar
Li, N., Feng, C., Shi, B., Kang, R. & Wei, W. Does the change of official promotion assessment standards contribute to the improvement of urban environmental quality? J. Clean. Prod. 348, 131254. (2022).
Google Scholar
Li, Y. et al. How can china’s sustainable development be damaged in consequence of financial misallocation? Analysis from the perspective of regional innovation capability. Bus. Strategy Environ. 31(7), 3649–3668. (2022). Portico.
Google Scholar
Acemoglu, D. & Johnson, S. Unbundling institutions. J. Polit. Econ. 113(5), 949–995. (2005).
Google Scholar
Holmes, R. M., Miller, T., Hitt, M. A. & Salmador, M. P. The interrelationships among informal institutions, formal institutions, and inward foreign direct investment. J. Manag. 39(2), 531–566. (2011).
Google Scholar
Zhang, F., Zhang, J., Gao, Y. & Wang, Z. How does optimizing the business environment affect the capital flows between Northern and Southern china?? From the perspective of enterprises’ location choice for out-of-town investment. Int. Rev. Financial Anal. 94, 103295. (2024).
Google Scholar
Boamah, N. A. Segmentation, business environment and global informational efficiency of emerging financial markets. Q. Rev. Econ. Finance 84, 52–60. (2022).
Google Scholar
Peng, Y. & Tao, C. Can digital transformation promote enterprise performance? —From the perspective of public policy and innovation. J. Innov. Knowl. 7(3), 100198. (2022).
Google Scholar
Guo, C., Zhao, Y., Miao, Z., Li, W. & Chen, H. Indigenous R&D, outsourcing technology, and sustainable digital transformation. J. Knowl. Econ. (2024).
Google Scholar
Wu, K., Fu, Y. & Kong, D. Does the digital transformation of enterprises affect stock price crash risk? Finance Res. Lett. 48, 102888. (2022).
Google Scholar
Lu, Y., Xu, C., Zhu, B. & Sun, Y. Digitalization transformation and ESG performance: Evidence from China. Bus. Strategy Environ. 33(2), 352–368. (2024).
Google Scholar
Chen, T., Dong, H. & Lin, C. Institutional shareholders and corporate social responsibility. J. Financ. Econ. 135(2), 483–504. (2020).
Google Scholar
Ma, Y., Zhang, Q. & Yin, H. Environmental management and labor productivity: The moderating role of quality management. J. Environ. Manag. 255, 109795. (2020).
Google Scholar
Murshed, M., Apergis, N., Alam, M. S., Khan, U. & Mahmud, S. The impacts of renewable energy, financial inclusivity, globalization, economic growth, and urbanization on carbon productivity: Evidence from net moderation and mediation effects of energy efficiency gains. Renew. Energy 196, 824–838. (2022).
Google Scholar
Chen, W. & Srinivasan, S. Going digital: Implications for firm value and performance. Rev. Acc. Stud. 29(2), 1619–1665. (2023).
Google Scholar
Cornaggia, J. & Li, J. Y. The value of access to finance: Evidence from m&as. J. Financ. Econ. 131(1), 232–250. (2019).
Google Scholar
Widyawati, L. A systematic literature review of socially responsible investment and environmental social governance metrics. Bus. Strategy Environ. 29(2), 619–637. (2019). Portico.
Google Scholar
Billio, M., Costola, M., Hristova, I., Latino, C. & Pelizzon, L. Inside the ESG ratings: (Dis)agreement and performance. Corp. Soc. Responsib. Environ. Manag. 28(5), 1426–1445. (2021). Portico.
Google Scholar
Chen, X., Wan, P., Ma, Z. & Yang, Y. Does corporate digital transformation restrain ESG decoupling? Evidence from China. Humanit. Social Sci. Commun. 11(1). (2024).
Lin, B. & Chen, Z. Does factor market distortion inhibit the green total factor productivity in china?? J. Clean. Prod. 197, 25–33. (2018).
Google Scholar
Cho, S. Y., Lee, C. & Pfeiffer, R. J. Corporate social responsibility performance and information asymmetry. J. Acc. Public Policy 32(1), 71–83. (2013).
Google Scholar
Du, J. & Mickiewicz, T. Subsidies, rent seeking and performance: Being young, small or private in China. J. Bus. Ventur. 31(1), 22–38. (2016).
Google Scholar
Aguilera, R. V., Rupp, D. E., Williams, C. A. & Ganapathi, J. Putting the S back in corporate social responsibility: A multilevel theory of social change in organizations. Acad. Manag. Rev. 32(3), 836–863. (2007).
Google Scholar
Jamali, D., Lund-Thomsen, P. & Jeppesen, S. SMEs and CSR in developing countries. Bus. Soc. 56(1), 11–22. (2016).
Google Scholar
link